Our response to the NYT’s article:

Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen

Let’s pretend that this time the NYT has creditable unnamed sources. Mueller and his gang had their chance at bat. They could have ruled that the president did obstruct justice, and they could have manufactured evidence of criminal collusion with Russia. 

James Comey was fired because he is a snake in the grass. His own memos and his testimony prove he is a snake. Mueller was appointed as a result of James Comey being fired.

Read the second from the bottom paragraph. Comey is lying to the President. The FBI’s Crossfire-Hurricane investigation was still active.

James Comey is, with intent, playing his role to undermine the incoming President. Comey testified that he only read the urination portion to Donald Trump from the Steele dossier, moreover, he did not allow the President-Elect to hold or examine the dossier.

I believe this concealment led to James Comey firing.

James Comey did not tell President Trump that his national security adviser, who has the highest security clearance level, committed a felony. We ponder, if you as the president of the United States can’t trust the Director of the FBI, then it stands to reason, as president you can’t trust anyone in the FBI. If you recall, the press hounded President Trump over his slowness to fire Flynn, citing that the president had endangered national security by not firing Flynn sooner. That’s all on James Comey, “Agent Chaos” for endangering national security by deceiving President Trump. 

In one of Comey’s memos, he records a request from President Trump to investigate as to whether anyone in his campaign did conspire with Russia. Comey testified to the fact that firing him would not stop any ongoing investigations. Comey, during this testimony, also said he could be fired for cause or no cause at all. Comey’s worry that the President, by using the word hope in his presence in regards to General Flynn, is not a case for obstruction of justice. Hope is not a word of command. No one has been ever been charged for obstruction of justice because they used the word hope.

Then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified that the FBI had not been impeded in their investigations of Russian election inference or obstruction of justice. 

 The Democrats are hanging on what I underlined in black. Only judges and juries are able to exonerate a person. Officers in the Department of justice only weight if there is enough evidence to bring a charge in a courtroom or in this instance a charge in the House of Representatives. The portion of the sentence that I underlined in green is all that is relevant, in my opinion.  I am sure the perceived evidence on the obstruction side was President Trump’s public statements and his Twitter post. A person does not give up their right to free speech when they take the oath of office for the presidency.  

It is rather disappointing that the NYT continues to be staffed by Putin puppets. A case in point: Matt Apuzzo still has an article active that quotes from the Steele dossier, which is Russian propaganda that states Doctor Carter Page is a Russian spy. That has been proven false. I could have forgiven Apuzzo for writing the article because Agent Strzok and Lisa Page told him it was so. But, he hasn’t retracted the article or issued an apology to Doctor Carter Page. That is unforgivable in my eyes. For a greater understanding of what was afoot, we suggest you review the following articles on our site: James Comey: an agent for chaos. The letter we sent to President Trump. Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Written by Mark Pullen. The abuse of power by the FBI.