Blog

Our analysis of Bill Priestap’s testimony.

We first became aware of Priestap through our review of the Inspector General’s report on the Mid-Year Examine investigation, which was the Hillary Clinton email server investigation.

 This page from the Inspector General’s report is what raised our interest in Priestap. The not true arrow statement is refuted in our article, Lynch concealed Hillary’s espionage from FBI[https://www.dcdocumentreports.com/lynch-concealed-hillarys-espionage-from-fbi/]. That article shows that classified emails were sent to the Clinton Foundation and other breaches of national security, such as Clinton’s maid printing out TOP SECRET presidential briefings in Clinton’s  Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility.

The solid black arrow is pointing to Priestap’s admission that Hillary Clinton had committed a crime.

Priestap’s answer below, tells us why Clinton was not charged in part. Ms. Shen on page 58 tries to steer Priestap to her desired answer with limited success.

 

We show Clinton was breaking U.S. espionage laws in our cited above article. 

 

Priestap states Clinton did commit a crime as defined by the letter of the law.

 
Priestap says there is a time to consider politics as to whether to charge a person with a crime.
 
Now we see below that Priestap is speaking to making a spy into a double agent. Let’s suppose it was unthinkable to charge a President’s wife with espionage. But instead, they make the wife into a double agent to feed disinformation to the enemy. If Hillary Clinton had won the election, she might have been the first president that was a double agent. (1) Yes, the investigation was both a counterintelligence and criminal, however, there were no subjects, or targets of interest cited. See the Inspector General’s report page below these transcript pages with our comments. Note 1 on the page.

It seems as though Priestap was promoted into a position for which he didn’t have the memory capacity. When I read this passage in the testimony, I knew it was in the FBI’s report and I retrieved the pages.  

Priestap is wrong.

View the underlined sentences. These lines are speaking to Clinton’s server that she had in her home’s basement. The black box is about the server that Clinton rented at the server installation, PRN. That’s where Paul Combetta worked. Combetta bleach-bit wiped the server after a call from Clinton’s lawyers. Combetta told the FBI agent that he and the other employees had access to the files on Clinton’s server. The server did have TOP SECRET SPECIAL ACCESS intelligence files. Who is to say that an employee on the night shift didn’t view or copy those files?  

Priestap is mistaken in his belief that the FBI was able to run this investigation unencumbered from politics, hence, independently. See the Strzok’s testimony page and his text message below this testimony page.  

AG Lynch imposed this restriction upon the FBI. The reason for this restriction was Clinton had been sending emails that had classified content to the Clinton Foundation. We show the proof in our article, Lynch concealed Hillary’s espionage from FBI.

If the FBI is running an independent investigation, then why is the FBI taking orders from AG Lynch to narrow the scope of the investigation? 

Let’s hope we don’t have anymore Priestaps in management positions in the FBI.

We find it interesting that Priestap knew there was a credible threat to national security arising from their affair and he didn’t ask them if it were true. However, when it came to Mister Trump, he launched an investigation, code name, Crossfire-Hurricane, with no credible evidence.

Left page (2) That’s what the coworkers say when the police arrest a spy or a mass murderer.

It’s hard to understand how this man reached management in the FBI.

You will receive several payoffs as you go through these eleven pages of testimony.

Disclosure: We saw a lot of unauthorized disclosure. Clinton was sending classified emails to the Clinton Foundation, and she was having her maid enter her home’s SCIF while she was gone to collect TOP SECRET documents that were sent to the SCIF. We show the documents in our article>https://www.dcdocumentreports.com/we-formally-accuse-hillary-clinton-of-running-an-espionage-ring/

Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Researched done by Mark Pullen