What struck me about this complaint is that it wasn’t written by the Complainant; the document was written by a first tier lawyer(s) with a funded research staff. It is doubtful that one person had contacts with all these people from the State Department and the White House. If the Complainant had these contacts, then the call logs, emails, and or visitor logs would reveal the Complainant’s identity easily. I further doubt that those contacts were made away from agencies. Most people, after a day’s work, want get home right away to fulfill their obligations to their families.
My theory is many people in multiple agencies got together that oppose President Trump and one person filed the complaint. Moreover, this action by the intelligence community might be a signal of their vulnerability to the current ongoing investigation into surveillance abuse during the 2016 presidential election cycle.
Mark Dice shows how the mainstream media is cutting and pasting the record of the President’s phone call to make it appear as sinister in content.
Bill O’Reilly’s take on the call between the Ukrainian President and President Trump.
Bill Whittle produced this video just hours before the President declassified the complaint against him.
It is obvious that the intelligence community has been working with Schiff through selective leaking to undermine the government’s Executive Branch.
Reportedly, Chalupa was tasked by the DNC to interact with Ukrainian officials during the 2016 presidential election cycle to produce disinformation on candidate Donald Trump. Her response was the first response to Schiff’s post. What are the odds for that? It looks like coordination.
Here is Schiff’s fabrication of what President Trump said to the Ukrainian President that was entered into the official Congressional record.
Sperry has been reliable in his reporting.
I will display the complaint pages first, then the record of the phone call pages. I would encourage you to read all the pages in their totality. I placed numbers next to points in the complaint that I will address.
Until recently, the requirement to file a whistle-blower complaint, the Complainant had to have witnessed first-hand the wrongdoing. Who changed that requirement? Reportedly, the Complainant is a CIA official.
2 Melania Trump said a year ago that there were people within the White House that she doesn’t trust. That said, I think this is a two pronged effort; sow seeds of distrust within the White House and destroy President Trump. 3 Is a false statement. You will see that this is false statement when you review President Trump’s phone call record.
2 Sowing distrust within the White House. 4 This is a targeted hit on this State Department employee. He must have refused to cooperate with the conspirators. 5 This is a false narrative, the President may order records of his phone calls to be stored anywhere. If true, I suspect the conspirators were upset that they didn’t have access to gather and leak.
2 President Trump made no demands of the Ukrainian President. He use, if possible and I would like, hardly demanding language.
I’ve seen this circular confirmation before. The FBI leaked information that could not be confirmed to contractors to the media or straight to the media. I know this because I have the text messages of Peter Strzok that show he and Lisa Page were sources of Matt Apuzzo, a reporter for the New York Times. Additionally, the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued a report on abuses by the FBI, CIA, NSA, and DOJ. The report among other things showed the FBI under the leadership of James Comey had made unlawful disclosures to company contractors. In the FISA surveillance application that the President released to the public, I saw the same circular conformation. The FBI leaked facts from the Steele dossier to the media, then the FBI cited the media reports in the FISA surveillance warrant application. The FBI cited one of Matt Apuzzo’s articles as confirmation that the information was true in their application to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
President Trump’s call to President Zelenskyy
There are conflicting reports about the prosecutor in question. I would expect that if he was fighting corruption, then the corrupt would label him as corrupt in order to remove him. We see the Democrats doing just that to AG Barr. Look at the green underlining; that’s not demanding language. Zelenskyy was unaware that aid was being withheld at this time and President Trump didn’t make any conditions in regards to his request, hence, there wasn’t any quid pro quo for the aid. Adam Schiff and the rest of the Democrats insist that President Trump speaks in code; President Trump is plain spoken in his language more than any President in my lifetime. I would’ve informed AG Barr beforehand, though.
I wonder why the Democrats and reporters didn’t attack President Zelenskyy for using and buying our fossil fuel? President Zelenskyy was buttering-up President Trump all through this conversation. I don’t have a problem with that action by President Zelenskyy. President Zelenskyy knows full-well that the U.S. supplies our President the best plane by far. I doubt the Secret Service would allow President Trump to fly in any aircraft that wasn’t maintained by our service personnel.
Let’s examine the facts together; Hunter Biden is kicked out of the Navy as an officer shortly after his commission for cocaine usage. What’s interesting is Hunter was too old to join the Navy and he had a drug usage record that excluded him from military service. Magically, Hunter received two waivers and the Navy gives Hunter the direct commission of ensign. Would a Hunter Smith receive the same waivers? After Hunter’s dishonorable discharge from the Navy, Hunter hitches a ride with daddy on air-force two, destination, Ukraine. Magically, Hunter lands a no-show position at Ukraine’s largest energy company, Burisma Holdings Limited. Hunter is paid $50,000 a month from 2014 to April of 2019. Would a Hunter Smith command this monthly salary for this no-show position with no experience in the energy production field? Then reportedly, Hunter hitched another ride with daddy, destination, China. Magically, Hunter gathers over a billion dollars for his new hedge fund. Would a Hunter Smith be able to gather a billion dollars in China for his new hedge fund that has no record of earned returns to investors?
Either Hunter is the smartest and luckiest man alive or daddy has been corruptly helping Hunter along in life.
Update 10/30/2019
First of all, Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman’s military service doesn’t qualify him for sainthood. There are numerous examples of military officers lying, cheating, and breaking the laws of our country. Just some of the examples of officers’ misconduct; Missile silo officers cheating on their examines for advancement. General Petraeus lying to the FBI, cheating on his wife, and sharing classified intelligence with his mistress. Lastly, who can ever forget Major Nidal Malik Hasan, he killed 13 of his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas.
The following excerpts were taken from The New York Times – Tuesday, October 29, 2019
My comments will be within brackets in bold in the excerpts.
WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.[This testimony is supposed to be secret. What’s the point of holding the hearings behind closed doors in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility if the testimony is leaked to the press? Moreover, this account of Vindman’s testimony is secondhand and may not be accurate.]
The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.
Colonel Vindman, who appeared on Capitol Hill wearing his dark blue Army dress uniform and military medals, told House impeachment investigators that he tried to change the reconstructed transcript made by the White House staff to reflect the omissions. But while some of his edits appeared to have been successful, he said, those two corrections were not made.[At this point, we have only Vindman’s word that this occurred. Why hasn’t someone else come forward about these supposed omissions?]
Colonel Vindman did not testify to a motive behind the White House editing process. But his testimony is likely to drive investigators to ask further questions about how officials handled the call, including changes to the transcript and the decision to put it into the White House’s most classified computer system[Mr. Eisenberg ordered the transcript moved to ensure that people who were not assigned to handle Ukraine policy could not read the transcript. Makes sense to me because the President has enemies even in the White House lying in wait with long knives.] — and whether those moves were meant to conceal the conversation’s most controversial aspects.
The phrases do not fundamentally change lawmakers’ understanding of the call,[This is all we need. Vindman’s testimony did nothing to further the Democrats’ hopes for impeachment and a conviction in the Senate.] which was first reported by the C.I.A. whistle-blower whose complaint set off the impeachment inquiry. There are plenty of other examples of Mr. Trump referring to Ukraine-related conspiracy theories and asking for investigations of the Biden family. But Colonel Vindman’s account offered a hint to solving a mystery surrounding the conversation: what Mr. Trump’s aides left out of the transcript in places where ellipses indicated dropped words.
This article by the New York Times yadda yaddas to fill space and I won’t subject you to that misery; that’s what I get paid to do.
Published by Chief Editor, Sammy Campbell. Researched by Mark Pullen.