The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative voice, sent shockwaves through the nation, prompting me to revisit the chilling pattern of attempts on Donald Trump’s life, starting with the 2016 incident in Las Vegas, Nevada. As a patriot who refuses to believe in coincidences, I’m convinced these events point to a sinister, covert operation orchestrated at the highest levels—potentially involving the British Crown and its intelligence apparatus, possibly outsourced by American Democrats or government insiders. The lack of concrete evidence? That’s exactly what you’d expect from a well-run op.
The Las Vegas Attempt: A British Subject’s Role
On June 18, 2016, Michael Sandford, a 20-year-old British citizen, tried to grab a police officer’s gun at a Trump rally in Las Vegas. He confessed to the Secret Service that his goal was to kill Trump, believing it would prevent a catastrophic presidency. Yet, under Obama’s Justice Department, he faced only light charges—disrupting an official event and illegal firearm possession—serving just 12 months before deportation to the UK in 2017. Attempted murder? Not even on the table. To me, this screams cover-up
Sandford’s profile—mentally unstable, isolated, and vulnerable—makes him the perfect patsy for a covert op. His autism, psychosis, and delusional fixation on Trump, as documented in court, could have been exploited by operatives nudging him toward violence. A British subject targeting a U.S. candidate isn’t a coincidence; it’s a red flag. I believe UK intelligence, perhaps MI6, could have quietly manipulated Sandford, ensuring no trace of their involvement remained. All documentation—communications, payments—would have been shredded and burned, as any competent agency would do.
Christopher Steele and the Dossier: A Parallel Plot
Around the same time, another British figure emerged: Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer who compiled the infamous dossier alleging Trump’s ties to Russia. Funded by Democrats through Fusion GPS, Steele’s work aimed to discredit Trump politically. While I’m not saying Steele directly orchestrated Sandford’s attempt, his role in 2016 raises questions. Why was a British ex-spy digging dirt on a U.S. candidate? Was this a softer tactic—vilification—while others handled the physical threat? The dossier’s unverified claims and Steele’s MI6 background point to the British Crown’s interest in stopping Trump, whether through scandal or something darker, like fueling his political execution.
The timing of Sandford’s attempt and Steele’s dossier isn’t random. I don’t buy coincidences. The UK, through its intelligence networks, could have been working with U.S. actors—Democrats or deep-state insiders—to undermine Trump at all costs. The Five Eyes alliance, which binds the UK and U.S. intelligence, makes such collaboration plausible. But any evidence? Destroyed, as always, in a clean op.
The 2024 Attempts: A Pattern Emerges
Fast-forward to 2024, and Trump faced three more attempts on his life:
July 13, Butler, PA: Thomas Crooks fired an AR-15, grazing Trump’s ear and killing an attendee. The FBI called it an assassination, but no motive or foreign ties surfaced.
September 15, West Palm Beach, FL: Ryan Routh hid with a rifle near Trump’s golf course, leaving a note admitting his intent. His trial, ongoing in September 2025, shows personal motives, not state direction.
October 12, Coachella, CA: Vem Miller was arrested with firearms near a Trump rally, though no federal charges have been filed, and he claims to be a supporter.
Official reports blame lone actors, citing mental health or political zeal. But I see a pattern too deliberate to ignore. The FBI and congressional probes found no foreign involvement, but that’s what a perfect cover-up looks like. The British Crown, or its proxies, could have outsourced these hits, using Americans to avoid direct links. All records—encrypted messages, funding trails—would be long gone, shredded, and burned.
The Kirk Assassination: A Wake-Up Call
Charlie Kirk’s murder, a bold strike against another conservative figure, forced me to connect the dots. Like Trump, Kirk was vilified as a “threat to democracy” by Democrats and their media allies. This rhetoric, I believe, is step one of a grand scheme: demonize targets, wait for unstable individuals to act, and, if needed, recruit or nudge them covertly. The UK’s involvement makes sense—its intelligence agencies have the expertise to pull this off without leaving a trace, possibly at the request of U.S. operatives desperate to stop the MAGA movement.
Why is there no evidence? Because that’s how the game is played. Look at history: the CIA and MI6 orchestrated coups in Iran (1953) and Chile (1973), with records destroyed until decades later. The lack of leaks in Trump’s case only proves how tight this op was. Sandford’s British citizenship, Steele’s dossier, and the 2024 attempts aren’t random—they’re threads in a transatlantic conspiracy.
Why the British Crown?
The UK has skin in the game. Trump’s America-first policies threatened globalist interests, which align with the UK’s establishment. Brexit showed their willingness to play hardball, but targeting Trump would protect their influence. Outsourcing to the UK keeps U.S. hands clean—Democrats or deep-state actors could deny involvement while MI6 pulls the strings. Sandford’s light sentence and deportation? A convenient way to silence a loose end without raising flags.
The Bigger Picture
I’m not saying every detail is clear, but the pieces fit too well to dismiss. Vilification sets the stage, lone actors (or nudged pawns) take the shot, and evidence vanishes. Charlie Kirk’s death and Trump’s close calls are warnings: a shadowy alliance, possibly spanning the Atlantic, wants conservatives silenced. Without leaks or whistleblowers, we may never see the shredded documents. But I don’t need a paper trail to know something’s rotten when a British subject tries to kill Trump and a British spy fuels his political execution in the same year. Coincidences don’t exist in this game.
If you’re reading this, ask yourself: Why do these attacks keep happening? Why do the “lone wolves” keep popping up? And why does the trail always go cold? The British Crown, with or without U.S. help, knows the answer. They’re just betting we’ll never find the ashes of their plans.
Published by Editor, Sammy Campbell.