When President Trump fired James Comey in 2017, a trove of revealing documents from Comey’s tenure as FBI Director surfaced. Among them, Comey conspicuously left unchecked two critical boxes on a form: one asking if he had ever been an agent of a foreign power, and another affirming he had not. This glaring omission sparked a firestorm on Twitter, with users demanding answers. Comey? Silent.
Then came the inventory of Comey’s office safe, which listed a binder labeled “Hillary Clinton Emails.” The FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s emails was long closed, so why keep this dossier? To me, it reeks of leverage—a potential weapon to wield over a hypothetical President Hillary Clinton. I directly asked Comey on Twitter why he held onto those emails. His response? Crickets.
Worse still, Comey maintained a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at his home. When FBI agents arrived to secure classified documents and dismantle the SCIF, they asked if he had any other classified materials elsewhere in his residence. Comey said no. That was a lie. In sworn testimony, he later admitted to retaining classified memos about his interactions with President Trump. So why wasn’t Comey charged with lying to federal agents? Why no consequences for illegally holding classified documents or leaking them to unauthorized individuals?
Here’s where it gets chilling: I suspect Comey may still be orchestrating rogue elements within the FBI’s counterintelligence division. His cryptic “86—47” seashells post could be a coded signal to rogue agents, possibly even a trigger for an operation targeting President Trump. If I were the FBI Director, I’d have Comey under 24/7 surveillance—tracking his every move, meeting, and potential dead drops to uncover any covert communications with government insiders or hostile operatives.
Published by Editor, Sammy Campbell.